Shaking Hands with Bill Clinton

Being an Iowan is a unique perogative on a lot of things. Corn and pork dominate the state so agriculture is huge. The state is very WASP'y with some small pockets of diversity thrown in here and there. We have the Field of Dreams, the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library, and the world's largest wooden nickel.

However, nothing compares to the experience you get as an Iowan every four years when it is time to select candidates for President. Iowans probably take for granted the unrivaled access they get to candidates. They feign interest and complain about all the telephone calls, but then they get special moments like I got today.

50 feet. That is how far I was from the stage at Hillary Clinton's campaign rally. 50 feet from #42 Bill Clinton and his wife. Perhaps one of the most iconic political couples in American history. The experience was akin to a rock concert (also used for the Obama experience, although this crowd was probably only 1/3 of the crowd Obama pulled here). Hillary's speech was nothing special, she does not inspire. However, Bill Clinton was different, even with only 5 minutes. It is something to watch a born politician work. You could tell that Bill Clinton still had "it" and could sell "it" if he needed too. Sure his presence on the campaign trail indicates the Hillary campaign is concerned about surging Obama fundraising. Sure he was kept on a leash in order not to upstage his ordinary partner. But Bill Clinton is still a huge draw. The crowd clammored to be near him.

I was struck by one scene after Bill had spoken and stepped off the stage when an elderly woman reached out to give him a kiss on the cheek. Bill gave her a big hug and kissed her on the hand and then lingered by the rail holding on to the woman's hand. She simply stood there listening to Hillary stroking and patting Bill's hand...clearly comforted by someone that she had obviously deeply connected with in his time in power, even though she had clearly never met him. It was a striking portrait of the humanity that Bill Clinton had/has. The end of his Presidency stripped away some of his humanity but this small portrait demonstrated why he remains popular, and why someone so distantly removed from the common man, like George Bush, struggles so much with the "common man" image.

At any rate, after Hillary was done droning I was able to shoot from my seat and find a good chink in the line so I could get up close...and then I got the chance to shake the hand and look square into the eyes of some one who is an extrordinary man. Bill Clinton had a firm but gentle shake and was a bit damp from the humidity and pressing the flesh with the masses, but you could still see a fire and energy in his eyes. The experience was vastly better then shaking hands and staring into the lifeless eyes of John Kerry in 2004. Bill Clinton simply oozes humanity. He repeatedly said to the crowd, "I am happy to be here, now go work hard for Hillary", or other similar coments that seemed to take the focus off of him and onto his partner. The man is still class to me, and today will go down as a memorable one in my life.

Iowans are lucky and take for granted these moments. The chance to rub elbows with heros and charlatans and make the decisions about who is worthy to proceed is one that should not be taken lightly. But damn isn't it easy to get lost in the glitz of someone like Bill Clinton.

Night #1 in the Obama Campaign Headquarters

My first round of volunteer help was delayed a few days due to work, but I did make it in last night for my first round of assisting in making calls for the Obama campaign. I had some great observations and experiences in the office.

I was able to help out for 2 hours last night, from 6pm to 8pm. I got there and was greeted by one of the interns working on the campaign. She walked me through the script that they were using for the night for my segment. Recently the campaign had sent brochures and DVD's to Iowa Democratic caucus goers and we were doing follow up calls to these folks to see if they had watched the biographical video and if they had any questions. We were also soliciting where people stood in terms of candidate support with 6 months until the caucus. There was another group of callers calling Dems in the next town over to tell them about an informational meeting that was coming up and inviting them to attend if possible. The office is small, but last night there were 10 volunteers making calls, and another 6-10 that had been out all day (in 90 degree heat) doing door to door canvassing.

Calling during the hours I did is hit or miss as it is dinner time and already busy for folks enjoying summer. I was able to place 89 calls during my two hours...but only made 12 "contacts" or people I was actually able to follow the script with. The rest of the calls were wrong numbers, not homes, or busy signals. Most of my list was populated with college students who had their college addresses listed and obviously were not still on-campus...another voting block difficult to track. Of the 12 folks I got to talk to, 10 were solid undecideds and not leaning toward any particular candidate. The other two were solid Obama supporters, so that was nice. I also was able to solicit one name to help volunteer with the campaign, which is always a great thing.

Overall it was a great time. Lots of volunteers and dinner was provided with more people calling in to help keep the volunteers fed. Being there has a way of sucking you into more helping. I am going to do more calls tomorrow and Monday, working tables at the Jazz Festival in town on Friday, and marching in the 4th of July parade...call me a junkie I guess.

On a related note, I will be updating my Where The Candidates stand piece this weekend once we have a better idea of what the second quarter fundraising looks like. Look for all of the Dems to post some nice numbers. I predict that a fourth candidate will be entering the top tier after this weekend...a name I kept hearing on some of the other calls in the office last night that people are excited about supporting...Gov. Bill Richardson.

Return of the Iowawineguy and Updates From The Field!

That's right, my relocation is nearly complete and I am now alive and well and working back in the state of Iowa, thus Greg the Wisconsin Democrat has become iowawineguy once again. I am currently living in a residence hall on the campus of the University of Iowa until I close on my new home in Coralville on July 6th. The job is going great and is a great breath of fresh air.

Something else smells great here too...the smell of caucus politics! Thick cut pork chops, the Field of Dreams, corn, and first in the nation Presidential voting...Iowa has it all!

I hope to be able to bring you better coverage from the the front lines of the 2008 campaign, at least from the GOOD side. I might even get motivated to go check out the GOP folks if they get close enough...Lord knows there will be plenty of seating...

Tonight I went to the field office for Barack Obama here in Iowa City. The office is in a large cluster of offices in a building in downtown, and is approximately 6 offices down from the Hillary Clinton field office. I got to meet several volunteers tonight as well as the county coordinator and volunteer coordinator Chris. I got a quick tour around the office, which is fairly small, changed my voter registration, signed a caucus pledge card for Obama (I really hope Gore doesn't get in the race now!), signed up for phone bank shifts and took myself a bumper sticker!

My initial impressions are very positive. Based on my experience with the Dean campaign in 2003, the Obama group already seems more organized and off to a better start. Of course Dean had a much harder road to hoe then Obama does these days. Chris said that they were having a large influx of volunteers, many of whom were young and had never done campaigns before (much like Dean). Most interesting was that they were getting a huge flood of high school volunteers, which was a new phenomenon to manage...lots of young people signing pledge cards in anticipation of their 18th birthday...remember these folks don't get polled!

The office already had numerous ways for me to get involved: upcoming July 4th parades, community summer events where they would have tables, canvassing, and phone banking.

Tomorrow night is my first round of phone banking, and I will be sure to report back after to let you know how it goes!

Of Many Things

The last two days my head has been swimming with the news and follow up that the elected Democratic Congressional majority is giving up the fight to end the war in Iraq and give George Bush, the great Liar, a blank check to continue this futile and costly war. Clearly Democrats were given the houses of Congress with a clear mandate to end this mess in Iraq and instead of working to do so, they have rolled over and given in...and at the same time ignored once again the will of the electorate. Maybe they will have a better shot come September when the next round of reports come, but my gut tells me this war will not end while George Bush is still in the White House unless funding is cut for the war. The Repbulicans are too strong in standing together so far.

Honestly, I have lost a lot of faith in the Democrats in Congress, and especially with the leadership. It is time for the ineffective Harry Reid to be replaced as Senate majority leader. He just does not have the stones to get the job done in the face of a tough adversary. Nanyc Pelosi...meh. Who knows. But if these leaders cannot get the caucus whipped into shape then they should be replaced for someone that will fight for the will of the electorate.

All of this also has me sizing up the candidates again and really wondering who I should be supporting in this mess. Only John Edwards and Chris Dodd have taken firm stands on ending this war now and they are starting to look like visionary messengers to me. I want to see Obama take the hardline of what is right...and for me what is right is getting the hell out of Iraq and focusing on real problems. So my choices are shaken and I am left doing a lot of evaluating.

Keith Olbermann has become a powerful voice for reason and progressive values on his evening telecast and he issued a scathing indictment to Bush and the Democrats last night. The value is greatest when you view the video, but I will post the text here. I remain, completely frustrated.

A Special Comment about the Democrats’ deal with President Bush to continue financing this unspeakable war in Iraq—and to do so on his terms:

Few men or women elected in our history—whether executive or legislative, state or national—have been sent into office with a mandate more obvious, nor instructions more clear: Get us out of Iraq.
Yet after six months of preparation and execution—half a year gathering the strands of public support; translating into action, the collective will of the nearly 70 percent of Americans who reject this War of Lies, the Democrats have managed only this:
The Democratic leadership has surrendered to a president—if not the worst president, then easily the most selfish, in our history—who happily blackmails his own people, and uses his own military personnel as hostages to his asinine demand, that the Democrats “give the troops their money”; The Democratic leadership has agreed to finance the deaths of Americans in a war that has only reduced the security of Americans; The Democratic leadership has given Mr. Bush all that he wanted, with the only caveat being, not merely meaningless symbolism about benchmarks for the Iraqi government, but optional meaningless symbolism about benchmarks for the Iraqi government.

The Democratic leadership has, in sum, claimed a compromise with the Administration, in which the only things truly compromised, are the trust of the voters, the ethics of the Democrats, and the lives of our brave, and doomed, friends, and family, in Iraq.You, the men and women elected with the simplest of directions—Stop The War—have traded your strength, your bargaining position, and the uniform support of those who elected you… for a handful of magic beans. You may trot out every political cliché from the soft-soap, inside-the-beltway dictionary of boilerplate sound bites, about how this is the “beginning of the end” of Mr. Bush’s “carte blanche” in Iraq, about how this is a “first step.”Well, Senator Reid, the only end at its beginning... is our collective hope that you and your colleagues would do what is right, what is essential, what you were each elected and re-elected to do.Because this “first step”… is a step right off a cliff.

And this President! How shameful it would be to watch an adult... hold his breath, and threaten to continue to do so, until he turned blue.But how horrifying it is… to watch a President hold his breath and threaten to continue to do so, until innocent and patriotic Americans in harm’s way, are bled white.You lead this country, sir? You claim to defend it? And yet when faced with the prospect of someone calling you on your stubbornness—your stubbornness which has cost 3,431 Americans their lives and thousands more their limbs—you, Mr. Bush, imply that if the Democrats don’t give you the money and give it to you entirely on your terms, the troops in Iraq will be stranded, or forced to serve longer, or have to throw bullets at the enemy with their bare hands.How transcendentally, how historically, pathetic. Any other president from any other moment in the panorama of our history would have, at the outset of this tawdry game of political chicken, declared that no matter what the other political side did, he would insure personally—first, last and always—that the troops would not suffer. A President, Mr. Bush, uses the carte
blanche he has already, not to manipulate an overlap of arriving and departing Brigades into a ‘second surge,’ but to say in unequivocal terms that if it takes every last dime of the monies already allocated, if it takes reneging on government contracts with Halliburton, he will make sure the troops are safe—even if the only safety to be found, is in getting them the hell out of there. Well, any true President would have done that, Sir. You instead, used our troops as political pawns, then blamed the Democrats when you did so.

Not that these Democrats, who had this country’s support and sympathy up until 48 hours ago, have not since earned all the blame they can carry home.“We seem to be very near the bleak choice between war and shame,” Winston Churchill wrote to Lord Moyne in the days after the British signed the Munich accords with Germany in 1938. “My feeling is that we shall choose shame, and then have war thrown in, a little later…”That’s what this is for the Democrats, isn’t it? Their “Neville Chamberlain moment” before the Second World War. All that’s missing is the landing at the airport, with the blinkered leader waving a piece of paper which he naively thought would guarantee “peace in our time,” but which his opponent would ignore with deceit.The Democrats have merely streamlined the process. Their piece of paper already says Mr. Bush can ignore it, with impugnity.

And where are the Democratic presidential hopefuls this evening? See they not, that to which the Senate and House leadership has blinded itself? Judging these candidates based on how they voted on the original Iraq authorization, or waiting for apologies for those votes, is ancient history now. The Democratic nomination is likely to be decided... tomorrow. The talk of practical politics, the buying into of the President’s dishonest construction “fund-the-troops-or-they-will-be-in-jeopardy,” the promise of tougher action in September, is falling not on deaf ears, but rather falling on Americans who already told you what to do, and now perceive your ears as closed to practical politics.Those who seek the Democratic nomination need to—for their own political futures and, with a thousand times more solemnity and importance, for the individual futures of our troops—denounce this betrayal, vote against it, and, if need be, unseat Majority Leader Reid and Speaker Pelosi if they continue down this path of guilty, fatal acquiescence to the tragically misguided will of a monomaniacal president.

For, ultimately, at this hour, the entire government has failed us. Mr. Reid, Mr. Hoyer, and the other Democrats... have failed us.They negotiated away that which they did not own, but had only been entrusted by us to protect: our collective will as the citizens of this country, that this brazen War of Lies be ended as rapidly and safely as possible.
Mr. Bush and his government... have failed us. They have behaved venomously and without dignity—of course. That is all at which Mr. Bush is gifted. We are the ones providing any element of surprise or shock here. With the exception of Senator Dodd and Senator Edwards, the Democratic presidential candidates have (so far at least)failed us.
They must now speak, and make plain how they view what has been given away to Mr. Bush, and what is yet to be given away tomorrow, and in the thousand tomorrows to come. Because for the next fourteen months, the Democratic nominating process—indeed the whole of our political discourse until further notice—has, with the stroke of a cursed pen, become about one thing, and one thing alone. The electorate figured this out, six months ago. The President and the Republicans
have not—doubtless will not. The Democrats will figure it out, during the Memorial Day recess, when they go home and many of those who elected them will politely suggest they stay there—and permanently. Because, on the subject of Iraq...The people have been ahead of the media....Ahead of the government...Ahead of the politicians...For the last year, or two years, or maybe three. Our politics... is now about the answer to one briefly-worded question.Mr. Bush has failed. Mr. Warner has failed. Mr. Reid has failed. So. Who among us will stop this war—this War of Lies? To he or she, fall the figurative keys to the nation.To all the others—presidents and majority leaders and candidates and rank-and-file Congressmen and Senators of either party—there is only blame… for this shameful, and bi-partisan, betrayal.

Gore Continues To Leave The Door Open, While Obama Struggles To Gain Traction

If you have been paying attention to polls over the last few weeks you will notice that the slight upward trend Obama had through much of March and April has disappeared with Hillary Clinton gaining back the momentum and then some. For me I think the real issue is Obama's lack of clear policy statements. I also think that as long as he stays this close he can afford to wait on releasing his policy statements until mid-summer/early fall and take the good sized bump they should give him.

Meanwhile, Al Gore continues to leave the door open to his entry in the race, from the New York Times:

When I asked Gore why he hasn’t dismissed all the speculation by issuing a Shermanesque refusal to stand, as he did in 2002, Gore said, "Having spent 30 years as part of the political dialogue, I don’t know why a 600-day campaign is taken as a given, and why people who aren’t in it 600 days out for the convenience of whatever brokers want to close the door and narrow the field and say, ‘This is it, now let’s place your bets’ — If they want to do that, fine. I don’t have to play that game."

I think the fall should be interesting, with some potential big names like Newt Gingrich, Al Gore, Fred Thompson, or the independent ticket featuring Bloomberg or Hagel making an entry into things.

Back in the Saddle, Headed to the Heat of Battle

I am a master of rhymes as well. Welcome back as we look to head into the summer months! Many apologies for my lack of posts...I have been involved in a job search. That process is concluded and in mid-June I will be moving to the great state of Iowa. I did this just to be able to more effectively give you insight on this race!

One development to check out today are two new adds from Bill Richardson. The ads may shock you, because they are meant to be humorous, which is a trait you do not see in many campaign ads these days. The ads do a good job of showcasing the deep resume that Bill Richardson has.

Check them out here.

Nothing to Say Except God Bless Va Tech

Fundraising Numbers

Here is a link to the final reports for the first quarter fundraising numbers. It confirms that Obama did outraise Clinton in primary dollars and has a donor list about 40,000 stronger then Clintons. This probably means that Obama will continue to rake in more money headed for the primaries then any of his opponents.

"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt."

Today we take a turn away from politics to mourn the passing of Kurt Vonnegut, your humble hosts favorite author.

In 1994 I was a junior in high school and starting to really figure out who I was a person. It was the year I started what would be a 7 year smoking habit. I think I had always been one of those really good kids through my upbringing that was smart enough to question things I saw, but not daring enough to challenge things I disagreed with. During my junior year I moved into 3rd year German class, which was held in conjunction with 4th year German because the classes were so small. In this German class were a number of friends I had in high school, as well as some folks that I always considered "different" then me. I was not in the high school band, but the majority of my friends were, and in this German class were a group of band kids that I did not usually hang out with. They rode skateboards, smoked pot, and generally had a free spirit and casualness about school and life in general.

Through the year I got to know this crew better and one of them especially, Ben, who was a senior. We used to spend a lot of time hanging out and talking about music (he introduced me to the Violent Femmes, the Mighty Mighty Bosstones, Lou Reed, and the John Spencer Blues Explosion), current politics, and just who we were in the world. The deep stuff ya know! Anyway, I still remember the day that I was at Ben's house and after some discussions he told me that there were some books I needed to read. He took me up to his room and put two books in my hands that would fundamentally help change me. The first book was "A Clockwork Orange" by Anthony Burgess. I got this book because we had been talking about the movie version that I had recently seen. The second book he gave me was "Bluebeard" by Kurt Vonnegut. He gave me the warning, "This book will make you want to chain smoke", and he was right. I had never read a book written like "Bluebeard" was, it was cynical, yet optimistic, descriptive and rich. It is hard to explain, but it was a book that helped a part of me to wake up. A part of me that would start to question and seek out answers on my own on a variety of things.

Another thing that I learned from Ben was the amazing value of the library, and after my first taste of Vonnegut I hungrily went back for more and read many of his works: "Slaughterhouse Five", "Cat's Cradle", "Welcome to the Monkey House", "Galapagus", and "Breakfast of Champions". Part of the appeal of many of the books was the pseudo-science fiction they contained. They were also funny and entertaining, and revealed so much of the author in the process. Each one of those books has a place in my heart for the wonderful tales and emotions they stirred up in me.

Seeing that Vonnegut had passed away this morning was like a punch in the gut. You hate to lose those that have clearly made such an impact on you, and in ways that are so hard to describe. Some of the comments I have seen reflect back a piece of Vonnegut's words in "Slaughterhouse Five" by saying that he did not really die, he just became "unstuck in time".

I leave you with some of my favorite Vonnegut quotes, both from text and from life:

Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be.

I want to stand as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all the kinds of things you can't see from the center.

People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order so they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say.

1492. As children we were taught to memorize this year with pride and joy as the year people began living full and imaginative lives on the continent of North America. Actually, people had been living full and imaginative lives on the continent of North America for hundreds of years before that. 1492 was simply the year sea pirates began to rob, cheat, and kill them.

Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way.

Warrior vs. Priest

Edit: I am re-editing the post after reading an article by Ron Brownstein that I quote below.

To be fair, Barack Obama is a newcomer to the national presidential stage and has not had to undergo the rigid autopsy that the press, pundits, and opposition put candidates through. So it is difficult to read and hear about his "rookie mistakes"" as this piece in The Politico points out.

So many of the issues seem trivial to me, details lost in storytelling, but they are the kind of "bird pecks" that can start to undermine a candidate. Someone like a Hillary Clinton has been bird pecked to death, and so you know what you are getting with her and she knows how to respond. Obama is, by some measures, pristine in the world of politics. Of course it is our American nature to tarnish those images as much as possible to see how a candidate can rise above it.

It will be telling to see how Obama continues to shape his line of reason and react to some much he put down in print or said publicly before he decided to run for office.

Ron Brownstein raises the fascinating question about what type of candidate Barack Obama can ultimately become...warrior or priest. The money quotes for me:

It's not much of an oversimplification to say that the blue-collar Democrats tend to see elections as an arena for defending their interests, and the upscale voters see them as an opportunity to affirm their values. Each group finds candidates who reflect those priorities.

Democratic professionals often describe this sorting as a competition between upscale "wine track" candidates and blue-collar "beer track" contenders. Another way to express the difference is to borrow from historian John Milton Cooper Jr.'s telling comparison of the pugnacious Theodore Roosevelt and the idealistic Woodrow Wilson. Cooper described the long rivalry between Republican Roosevelt and Democrat Wilson as a contest between a warrior and a priest.

In modern times, the Democratic presidential race has usually pitted a warrior against a priest.Warrior candidates stress their ability to deliver on kitchen table concerns and revel in political combat. They tout their experience and flout their scars. Their greatest strength is usually persistence, not eloquence; they don't so much inspire as reassure. Think of Harry Truman in 1948, Hubert Humphrey in 1968 and, in a somewhat more diluted fashion, Walter Mondale in 1984 and John Kerry in 2004.

The priests, whose lineage runs back through McCarthy to Adlai Stevenson, present a very different face. They write books and sometimes verse. They observe the campaign's hurly-burly through a filter of cool, witty detachment. Their campaigns become crusades, fueled as much by inchoate longing for a "new politics" as tangible demands for new policies. In the past quarter of a century, Hart, Bradley and the late neo-liberal Paul Tsongas in 1992 each embodied the priest in Democratic presidential politics....

Not only have priests — including Hart, Tsongas and Bradley — run better among voters with college degrees, they've tended to run well in the Northeast, the West
Coast and portions of the upper Midwest where wine track voters congregate; the
warriors usually thrive in interior states such as Ohio, Missouri or Tennessee, where college graduates constitute 40% or less of the Democratic electorate.

That picture is coming into focus again, with one twist. The priests typically have been flattened among black voters, but Obama's African American heritage is helping him, already, to split the black vote fairly closely with Clinton in most surveys...

Since Obama entered the campaign, the question he's faced most often is whether he is "black enough" to win votes from African Americans. But the more relevant issue may be whether Obama is "blue enough" to increase his support among blue-collar whites.

I guess this article really effects the lense with which I view the campaign much more. Just reading it made me very aware of my own personal biasis toward the messages I hear from the Obama and Clinton camps and it makes great sense to me. I feel a strong disconnect from the blue collar folks out there and so their reality is often not always on my radar. I can totally see the compelling pull of the Clinton message to the blue collar worker who has to look out for number one more so then the grand ideology of a "priest" like Obama. Perhaps it is my own history, since graduating high school I have never been apart from the college campus. Having just moved off campus I am beginning to get "back in touch" with some of the realities of the world at large, but I still come from a place of such privlege that I cannot fully grasp some of the issues out there.

The article points out that priests have clearly been clobbered at the polls unless they make a transition toward the warrior front, someone like a Bill Clinton who walked like a warrior but had the vision of a priest can do well. However I am now very tuned into the message of Obama and how it might play to folks that are not neccessarily part of that University Ivory Tower. Perhaps he has the potential to rise above his small mistakes and find the warrior mentality. Perhaps he is too far seperated from his days of a community activist to reclaim it. It is a difficult road for him to walk, but one he must, because Clinton can do the warrior better, and John Edwards is certainly already well established as a priest. Could Barack Obama be the Paladin of the campaign (only WoW players may understand this analogy)?? Only time will tell.

Vilsack to Endorse Clinton

MSNBC is reporting that Tom Vilsack will endorse Hillary Clinton during her campaign stop in Iowa on Monday.

I file this under the "duh" category. Vilsack is the former head of the Democratic Leadership Council...a so called group for "moderate" Democrats, that is really a fairly conservative minded organization. They are also enthusiastically endorsing Hillary since the Clinton's were fundamental in the founding of the Council.

The bigger question is, does it matter? Vilsack could not garner enough intereste in his own state to justify staying in the race, so will it really matter that much? It probably matters more that Vilsack's wife is endorsing Clinton as Chrissy Vilsack is very popular in the state.

Edwards Announcement

Well first of all thoughts and prayers to Mrs. Edwards and the Edwards family for the hopeful safe treatment of the cancer that has returned and moved from her breast into the rib bones. It sure sounds like it is treatable but will never actually go away. I can't imagine the difficulty she must face in having to continue to battle cancer.

I was surprised to hear that the Edwards campaign continues, especially considering that he has stated in the past that he would leave the race if his wife's cancer returned. I will have to wait and see what some of the medical diagnosis says about the cancer...perhaps it is not so bad that it will debiliate her. He continues on and perhaps gains some compassion and understanding for the public announcement...however, the political cynic in me starts to wonder. If her cancer is so manageable that she and he are able to continue travelling, why announce it to the world? Why not keep that private, manage the treatments, and respond later is the cancer progresses?

Maybe things will change as they learn more about the cancer and if it has spread further and he wanted to address the issue before it leaked out in the press, at any rate, more power to them and I will keep them in my thoughts. I like Edwards quite a bit so I was worried at his possible departure.

Thoughts?

John Edwards Development

ABC News ticker at the top of their website:
JOHN EDWARDS AND HIS WIFE, ELIZABETH, TO HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE THURSDAY AT NOON ET -- DEVELOPING
Troubling news from DailyKos:


Aravosis has the possibilities:

This comes on the heels of Edwards canceling a campaign appearance recently due to his wife's health. More on that here.
What does this mean?
That everything is okay. Unlikely. You don't announce a press conference with your wife, and not tell the details in advance, if it's good news.
That Edwards is dropping out of the race and that his wife is seriously ill. Obviously we don't know, and I don't like speculating about someone's health like this. But this seems the most likely possibility at this point.
That Edwards is taking a break from campaigning to tend to his wife. This is also possible, but geez, that's still not good news for his campaign or for his family of course.

Please let it be the first one...

The "1984" Hillary Ad

Well, you may have likely already seen this pro-Obama ad since it has officially gone "viral" on the Internet. In case you haven't, you can check it out here. The ad is a recreation of a famous Apple computer ad from 1984 and spoofs George Orwell's famous book of the same title. The creator of the ad is unknown, suffice to say they are not a fan of Hillary.

The impact of the ad is up to interpretation for all who watch it. Personally I found it jarring, and I am not sure why, perhaps the imagery of the Big Brother esque Hillary and the powerful violent act of smashing the screen. Or it could be the symbolism of the hope that I feel Obama brings to a Democratic primary that is currently being led by one of the "same old" politicians. Only time will tell if Obama really is different, but ads like this continue the suttle full on assault on the "Hillary is inevitable" line of reasoning.

When you watch the ad, what do you feel? What emotions does it trigger? What is the message to you?

Fundraising

One of the clearest ways to show you are a serious candidate for President is to fund raise large gobs of money which you can use to bludgeon your opponents and increase your name recognition. The end of the first quarter will occur at the end of March and at that time we should get a better picture of where some of the candidates stand. We have already seen one candidate drop out because of his lack of funding...could big numbers by the top candidates cause more to drop out? We won't know the official numbers until April, but Hotline has some leaked information on what to expect. Some of the highlights:

*It appears Barack Obama raised $12 million through March 1st, with half of it coming through online donations (which would surpass Howard Dean levels of online work, especially since it is mostly unsolicitied).

*Hillary Clinton will be transferring over about $11 million from her Senate re-election fund and may report a number as high as $32 million for the first quarter, but a decent size of that apparently is already earmarked for the general election and can't be used for the primaries.

*John Edwards should keep pace with $12-$15 million. Dodd and Richardson should also report decent gains.

Many pundits are saying that it will be the 2nd Quarter (April-June) that will be the most important fundraising time, but an early start certainly helps.

First New Hampshire Poll in Over a Month

Shows good news for Obama...if he is closing on Clinton's lead this early, look out.

DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE -- 212 Democrats and those who lean Democratic, sampling error plus or minus 4 percentage points. Suffolk
Clinton: 28
Obama: 26
Edwards: 17
Biden: 3
Kucinich: 2
Richardson: 2
Unsure: 17

The Nevada Fox News Debate

John Edwards yesterday became the first candidate to announce he would not attend a debate sponsored by Fox News and the Democratic Party in Nevada.

This scheduled debate has caused a large dustup in the online liberal community due to Fox News' record of distorting Democratic positions and outright disrespect of Democrats. For whatever reason, the Nevada Democratic Party decided to let Fox host and run a debate. Many, including myself, see no positive outcome out of a debate framed and run by what is clearly a Republican propaganda wing. Hopefully Edwards will not be the last candidate to back out of this ill conceived plan.

Breaking: Vilsack to Become First Candidate to Drop Out

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17297085/

Vilsack really never had a chance, and he had a conflict of who he was. He spent 5 years as the head of the Democratic Leadership Council that attacked anti-war Democrats and took a more conservative approach to somethings. He was recently forced out of that position when the org decided to throw themselves behind the Clinton campaign. Vilsack then tried to become an anti-war candidate calling for immeadiate withdrawl. He was just too plain to draw any traction in the crowded field...but he will make an excellent cabinet member in the next administration.

Update: I must say it is a crazy testament to the fast moving timeline that someone has announced, fundraised, and dropped out due to the fact that he is not gaining traction. Vilsack is smart though, he does not want to be embarassed by not finishing well in Iowa.

Clinton's Imperial Presidency?

NO ONE DARE CRITICIZE HILLARY CLINTON!

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
February 21, 2007 -- There’s a new mortal sin in American politics: criticizing Hillary Clinton.Nobody’s allowed to do it.Certainly none of her opponents. If they dare to, Hillary sends in one of her boys, who practically accuses them of being un-American. In January, without ever mentioning Hillary’s name and before she was even a candidate, John Edwards dared to express the view that silence on the Iraq War was “betrayal.” Ignoring the substance of Edwards’ speech, Clinton gun slinger Howard Wolfson immediately shot from the hip, attacking him for waging a negative campaign:“In 2004, John Edwards used to constantly brag about running a positive campaign. Today, hehas unfortunately chosen to operate his campaignwith political attacks on Democrats who are fightingthe Bush administration’s Iraq policy.”

If you like the idea of censorship of critical political speech, you’ll love Hillary Clinton as President. To Hilary, open political discourse apparently means that her opponents and their surrogates are free to compliment her. If they do otherwise, it’s off with their heads.Not even supporters of Hillary’s opponents are allowed to disparage her. If they do, the wrath of Hillary surfaces and it is not a pretty sight.

The latest sinner is Hollywood superstar David Geffen. Geffen used to be an avid supporter of the Clintons – he raised over $18 million for them in the past. But no more. Now the Dreamworld founder is backing Obama – and he’s not afraid to say so.That’s why Hillary wants him banished to political Siberia.Geffen gave an interview to New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd. Here’s a few tidbits from him that apparently rankled Hillary:“… I don’t think that another incredibly polarizing figure, no matter how smart she is and no matter how ambitious she is — and God knows, is there anybody more ambitious than Hillary Clinton? — can bring the country together.”“Obama is inspirational, and he’s not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family. ““It’s not a very big thing to say, ‘I made a mistake’ on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can’t,”Geffen also call Bill Clinton “a reckless guy” who “gave his enemies a lot of ammunition to hurt him and to distract the country.”Hillary was outraged at what she called these ‘vicious’ and ‘personal’ attacks against her and her husband by Geffen.

Vicious? Those comments were vicious?Yes, to Hillary, they were. So, the Clinton camp wasted no time in trotting out Howard Wolfson to once again defend the honor of the heiress apparent and call for Geffen’s head. This time even an apology wouldn’t be enough: Hillary demanded that Obama dump Geffen and return the $1.3 million that he raised for Obama because of Geffen’s negative comments about the frontrunner and her husband. That would make things a lot easier for Hillary, wouldn’t it? In the world according to Hillary, there’s no place in politics for anyone who doesn’t love her and Bill.

Unfortunately for Hillary, Obama doesn’t seem to be shaking in his boots. In response to Hillary’s tirade, his campaign pointed out her hypocrisy and ignored her ridiculous demands. Obama’s spokesman pointedly refused to get in the middle of a Clinton- Geffen war.“It is ironic that the Clintons had no problem with David Geffen when he was raising the $18 million and sleeping at their invitation in the Lincoln bedroom.…It is also ironic that Senator Clinton lavished praise on Monday and is fully willing to accept today the support of South Carolina Senator Robert Ford who said if Barack Obama were to win the nomination, he would drag down the rest of the Democratic Party because he’s black.”(Remember Ford: he’s the guy that signed a $200,000 contract with the Clinton campaign right before he endorsed Hillary)

Hillary has never been tolerant of open political debate if that means people can legitimately criticize or publicly disagree with her. Now she’s become even more dogmatic, arrogantly believing that her frontrunner status is tantamount to a coronation. She seems to believe that it is an act of war for a fellow democrat to even challenge her for the nomination. If they disagree with her, they need to be punished and sent to their room.Watch for more of this imperial behavior. It’s her trademark and it will be the signature of a Hillary Clinton presidency. She learned a thing or two from Richard Nixon.

Tom Daschle Endorses Obama

WASHINGTON - Sen. Barack Obama won the endorsement Wednesday of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, who said the White House hopeful "personifies the future of Democratic leadership in our country." Daschle said Obama has a"great capacity to unify our country and inspire a new generation of young Americans, just as I was inspired by the Kennedys and Martin Luther King when I was young."
Obama began his term in the Senate after Daschle lost his seat in 2004. But the South Dakotan served in the Senate with several of the other Democratic presidential hopefuls, including Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, Joe Biden of Delaware, Chris Dodd of Connecticut and John Edwards, a former lawmaker.
Daschle said the party was "very fortunate to have an extraordinary field of candidates."